Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>Personally, I'd just put the effort into setting up the insert/delete
>stuff and a means to periodically roll that info up into a summary
>table. I know that this has come up in the past, so you can probably
>find someone else who's already done this and might be able to provide
>you with code. Even if you have to write it from scratch, I doubt it's
>more work than what you've already put into trying to get the other
>scheme to work.
>
Thanks.Do you think that using LISTEN/NOTIFY mechanism for rolling up
the summary table
could be used?