From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQLJ, any plans? |
Date: | 2005-11-26 12:19:23 |
Message-ID: | 438852CB.3080701@opencloud.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On 11/25/05, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>
>>>are there any plans to get embedded SQL (SQLJ) to work with the jdbc
>>>in postgres?
>>
>>What fails with the current driver?
>>
>
> The driver works fine, AFAIK... but it can use the SQLJ syntax?
Uh.. from my limited knowledge of SQLJ, isn't it like "embedded SQL" in
the C world? i.e. you have a translator (the equivalent to ecpg) that
takes annotated source with SQLJ syntax and turns it into a regular Java
source file that uses standard JDBC? So the driver itself never sees the
SQLJ syntax..
Sounds like what you are looking for is a SQLJ translator? I don't know
of any plans to write a postgresql-specific translator .. aren't there
generic ones available, since the DB-level interface (JDBC) is standardized?
-O
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-11-26 23:08:01 | [Fwd: I found a bug in postgresql8.0.3] |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-11-26 05:52:22 | Re: SQLJ, any plans? |