From: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Date: | 2005-11-16 14:51:31 |
Message-ID: | 437B4773.1040404@boreham.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>Spend a fortune on dual core CPUs and then buy crappy disks... I bet
>for most applications this system will be IO bound, and you will see a
>nice lot of drive failures in the first year of operation with
>consumer grade drives.
I guess I've never bought into the vendor story that there are
two reliability grades. Why would they bother making two
different kinds of bearing, motor etc ? Seems like it's more
likely an excuse to justify higher prices. In my experience the
expensive SCSI drives I own break frequently while the cheapo
desktop drives just keep chunking along (modulo certain products
that have a specific known reliability problem).
I'd expect that a larger number of hotter drives will give a less reliable
system than a smaller number of cooler ones.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | William Yu | 2005-11-16 15:33:39 | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Previous Message | Steve Wampler | 2005-11-16 14:38:52 | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |