From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Luke Lonergan <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Adam Weisberg <Aweisberg(at)seiu1199(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
Date: | 2005-11-16 13:58:48 |
Message-ID: | 437B3B18.1040509@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>> I agree - you can get a very good one from www.acmemicro.com or
>> www.rackable.com with 8x 400GB SATA disks and the new 3Ware 9550SX SATA
>> RAID controller for about $6K with two Opteron 272 CPUs and 8GB of RAM
>> on a Tyan 2882 motherboard. We get about 400MB/s sustained disk read
>> performance on these (with tuning) on Linux using the xfs filesystem,
>> which is one of the most critical factors for large databases.
>>
>>
>
> Spend a fortune on dual core CPUs and then buy crappy disks... I bet
> for most applications this system will be IO bound, and you will see a
> nice lot of drive failures in the first year of operation with
> consumer grade drives.
>
There is nothing wrong with using SATA disks and they perform very well.
The catch is, make sure
you have a battery back up on the raid controller.
> Spend your money on better Disks, and don't bother with Dual Core IMHO
> unless you can prove the need for it.
>
The reason you want the dual core cpus is that PostgreSQL can only
execute 1 query per cpu
at a time, so the application will see a big boost in overall
transactional velocity if you push two
dual-core cpus into the machine.
Joshua D. Drake
> Alex
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron | 2005-11-16 13:58:56 | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases |
Previous Message | William Yu | 2005-11-16 13:08:50 | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( 5TB) |