From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Evandro's mailing lists (Please, don't send personal messages to this address)" <listasjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Beyond the 1600 columns limit on windows |
Date: | 2005-11-08 13:48:26 |
Message-ID: | 4370ACAA.2020709@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Evandro's mailing lists (Please, don't send personal messages to this
address) wrote:
> I'm doing a PhD in data mining and I need more than 1600 columns. I got an
> error message saying that I can not use more than 1600 columns.
> It is happening because I have to change categorical values to binary
> creating new columns.
Perhaps you don't want a relational database at all if you are
stretching it to match your client application in this way. Do I have it
right that you have something like
Table: bird_sighting_facts (bird, category, value)
1 | wingspan | 120mm
2 | beak-colour | red
3 | chest-colour| blue
...
And are converting it into:
expanded_bird_facts (bird, cat_wingspan, cat_beak_colour,
cat_chest_colour, ...)
In which case since you'll almost certainly be throwing away any
relational integrity you had in the first case I'd just throw a
lightweight wrapper around some dbfile files or similar.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Lester | 2005-11-08 13:53:50 | Detect Locked Row Without Blocking |
Previous Message | Florian Ledoux | 2005-11-08 13:47:09 | WinXP - statistics collector errors |