Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Chris Travers <chris(at)verkiel(dot)metatrontech(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-19 06:12:29
Message-ID: 4355E3CD.9030307@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

> Problem is: to offer such a thing with a straight face, we'd have to
> confine ourselves to an Oracle-subset version of SQL. For instance,
> lose the ability to distinguish empty-string from NULL.

I wasn't saying we write it - let Oracle do it :D

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Marques 2005-10-19 09:38:29 Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message Chris Travers 2005-10-19 05:59:54 Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message postgresql 2005-10-19 06:23:46 Restoring Database created on windows on FreeBSD
Previous Message Eric Gendron 2005-10-19 06:11:01 Re: Limitations of PostgreSQL