Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

From: Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-19 05:59:54
Message-ID: 4355E0DA.5030105@travelamericas.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:

>Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>
>
>>Strangely a pgsql to oracle exporter is a good thing. It'd be a great
>>feature of PostgreSQL. Imagine how many people would start on
>>PostgreSQL if they KNEW that one day they could easily move to Oracle if
>>they needed to. Risk management.
>>
>>
>
>Problem is: to offer such a thing with a straight face, we'd have to
>confine ourselves to an Oracle-subset version of SQL. For instance,
>lose the ability to distinguish empty-string from NULL.
>
>
Funny how many Oracle DBA's don't seem to be aware of this "feature" ....

Funny how many of those that are seem to think that this is perfectly OK
:-( On the other hand, it is one weakness of Oracle that has not gotten
a major airing in public... It might be worth saving for when the FUD
starts to fly :-)

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron technology Consulting

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-10-19 06:12:29 Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-19 05:35:25 Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2005-10-19 06:02:03 Re: Reverse engineering SW
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-10-19 05:44:02 Re: unsigned types