Re: Comparative performance

From: Joe <svn(at)freedomcircle(dot)net>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comparative performance
Date: 2005-10-04 21:11:19
Message-ID: 4342EFF7.5010405@freedomcircle.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi Jim,

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Also, just because no one else has mentioned it, remember that it's very
> easy to get MySQL into a mode where you have no data integrity. If
> that's the case it's going to be faster than PostgreSQL (though I'm not
> sure how much that affects the performance of SELECTs).

Yes indeed. When I added the REFERENCES to the schema and reran the conversion
scripts, aside from having to reorder the table creation and loading (they used
to be in alphabetical order), I also found a few referential integrity errors in
the MySQL data.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-04 21:15:41 Re: SELECT LIMIT 1 VIEW Performance Issue
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-04 21:02:23 Re: Ultra-cheap NVRAM device