Re: Ultra-cheap NVRAM device

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ultra-cheap NVRAM device
Date: 2005-10-04 21:02:23
Message-ID: 20051004210223.GA40138@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

There was a discussion about this about 2 months ago. See the archives.

On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 01:02:26PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I thought this might be interesting, not the least due to the extremely low
> price ($150 + the price of regular DIMMs):
>
> http://www.tomshardware.com/storage/20050907/index.html
>
> Anybody know a good reason why you can't put a WAL on this, and enjoy a hefty
> speed boost for a fraction of the price of a traditional SSD? (Yes, it's
> SATA, not PCI, so the throughput is not all that impressive -- but still,
> it's got close to zero seek time.)
>
> /* Steinar */
> --
> Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe 2005-10-04 21:11:19 Re: Comparative performance
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-04 21:01:37 Re: Lists or external TABLE?