| From: | Ron Mayer <ron(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Backend crash with user defined aggregate |
| Date: | 2005-09-24 21:02:00 |
| Message-ID: | 4335BEC8.8090606@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hmm. Now that I look at it again, that message implies that something
> sent SIGTERM to the backend. You need to figure out where that signal
> is coming from and why. ...
> is it possible that you've started your postmaster with finite limits
> on process runtime? What is the platform exactly, anyway?
Thanks. That's something for me to look into monday. I don't think
there was a process runtime, but there might have been a memory limit.
The platform was a SuSE 9.1 on x86 but with so many updates & upgrades
from so many sources (rpm, apt, rcd, yast, tar.gz) that it's hard to
tell what it really is anymore. Monday I'll try to reproduce on a
cleaner system and/or look for the SIGTERM with strace or something.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-09-24 21:22:22 | Re: How many insert + update should one transaction |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-24 19:49:45 | Re: Slow connection to the database |