| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logging blemishes |
| Date: | 2005-09-21 19:44:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4331B836.9040905@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>>>>Example (log_line_prefix = '%t %q%u(at)%d %r %p %c:%l'):
>>>>
>>>>2005-09-19 19:16:39 EDT [unknown](at)[unknown] 6541 432f46d7.198d:1 LOG:
>>>>connection received: host=[local] port=
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>In the case above, I rather expected %q to kick in. With the additional
>>tests it would.
>>
>>It's debatable, though, and not hugely important either way, I think.
>>
>>
>
>Are you saying "connection received" should honor %q? It seems it is a
>session line, rather than a server line, no?
>
>
>
Maybe, the line just struck me as rather ugly. Never mind.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-21 19:58:40 | Re: pg_dump COMMENT ON DATABASE sometimes inappropriate |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-21 19:39:11 | Re: Table Partitioning is in 8.1 |