Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Is it possible that the Release Notes do not fully explain the
> Constraint Exclusion feature? Or is it the consensus that it works but
> not quite well enough to make a song and dance about yet?
I hardly think that the existing constraint-exclusion code is enough for
us to claim we "support table partitioning". There's too much grunt
work that the DBA still has to do to set up a partitioning arrangement.
regards, tom lane