Re: Recommendation on bytea or blob for binary data like images

From: Leon Torres <leon(at)oss(dot)minimetria(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recommendation on bytea or blob for binary data like images
Date: 2005-09-06 20:21:59
Message-ID: 431DFA67.4060308@oss.minimetria.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Thanks for the quick response. We will be using bytea from now on. :-)

- Leon

Tom Lane wrote:

>leon(at)oss(dot)minimetria(dot)com writes:
>
>
>>Hi, I'd like to know what the official recommendation is on which binary
>>datatype to use for common small-binary size use.
>>
>>
>
>If bytea will work for you, it's definitely the thing to use. The only
>real drawback to bytea is that there's currently no API to read and
>write bytea values in a streaming fashion. If your objects are small
>enough that you can load and store them as units, bytea is fine.
>
>BLOBs, on the other hand, have a number of drawbacks --- hard to dump,
>impossible to secure, etc.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bob Ippolito 2005-09-06 20:24:18 Re: uuid type for postgres
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2005-09-06 19:57:55 Re: uuid type for postgres