| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, AJ ONeal <coolaj86(at)proton(dot)me> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How to Build Postgres in a Portable / Relocatable fashion? |
| Date: | 2024-05-04 00:29:34 |
| Message-ID: | 42b0bfdf-f6e8-4db9-8178-b9d112c475ce@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 5/3/24 17:07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:27:12PM +0000, AJ ONeal wrote:
>>>> Back in the good old days there was official 1st-party support for Linux:
>>> This
>>> was/is a third party site.
>>
>> Oh. I thought that EDB was *the* Postgres company like MySQL AB was *the* MySQL company. My mistake.
>
> How did you come to that conclusion? Is there something we could do to
> avoid this assumption.
>
From here:
#1 IN POSTGRES
THE MOST ADMIRED, DESIRED, & USED DATABASE.
is not helpful.
Though I would say the bigger issue is here:
https://www.postgresql.org/download/
Where you have
Packages and Installers
and then further down
3rd party distributions
It tends to imply that the 'Packages and Installers' are not third
party, when they are to some degree or another.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2024-05-04 00:35:05 | Re: How to Build Postgres in a Portable / Relocatable fashion? |
| Previous Message | AJ ONeal | 2024-05-04 00:12:55 | Re: How to Build Postgres in a Portable / Relocatable fashion? |