Re: distributed performance testing

Tom Lane wrote:

>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make
>>constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would
>>create a branch called "test-set-yyyy-mm-dd" or some such, make your
>>changes there, add a test script under some well known name, and commit
>>the branch.
>>
>>
>
>This seems a pretty unconvincing argument for SVN ... we could perfectly
>well do that in CVS, no?
>
>
>
>

You could well be right. And I should know better than to engage in
speculation like that and possibly cause us to be inundated by
proponents of SCMfoo, most of whom will never write a line of code for
postgres let alone ever have to commit anything ;-) Pardon my weakness.

cheers

andrew