Re: distributed performance testing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: distributed performance testing
Date: 2005-08-13 22:29:58
Message-ID: 26323.1123972198@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Incidentally, use of a different SCM system might well make
> constructing test sets more simple. Imagine, say, in SVN, you would
> create a branch called "test-set-yyyy-mm-dd" or some such, make your
> changes there, add a test script under some well known name, and commit
> the branch.

This seems a pretty unconvincing argument for SVN ... we could perfectly
well do that in CVS, no?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-08-13 22:41:22 Re: distributed performance testing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-13 22:24:01 Re: gettime() - a timeofday() alternative