Re: installation on Mac OS X 10.5.1

From: Niklas Johansson <spot(at)tele2(dot)se>
To: Chuck <chuckr(at)velofish(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: installation on Mac OS X 10.5.1
Date: 2007-12-22 10:05:38
Message-ID: 42F75A3D-50A8-45BF-95C0-CE7517A196AB@tele2.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On 22 dec 2007, at 06.56, Chuck wrote:
> What is the best way to install PostgreSQL on Mac OS X 10.5.1?
> Or, perhaps I should ask is there a preferred way to PostgreSQL on
> Mac OS X?
>
> Is a disk image installer fine? Or, is it better to compile all the
> components?

I've always installed from source and I've never been sorry. Haven't
tried it on Leopard yet though. There's no reason to believe that the
various binary installers should be worse than a source install, but
since I've never tried them I really can't tell.

Compiling from source is a good way to get to know both your OS and
Postgres better.

Sincerely,

Niklas Johansson

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-12-22 11:03:05 Re: installation on Mac OS X 10.5.1
Previous Message Richard Broersma Jr 2007-12-22 06:37:50 Constraint Trigger's referenced_table