From: | Niklas Johansson <spot(at)tele2(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Chuck <chuckr(at)velofish(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: installation on Mac OS X 10.5.1 |
Date: | 2007-12-22 10:05:38 |
Message-ID: | 42F75A3D-50A8-45BF-95C0-CE7517A196AB@tele2.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 22 dec 2007, at 06.56, Chuck wrote:
> What is the best way to install PostgreSQL on Mac OS X 10.5.1?
> Or, perhaps I should ask is there a preferred way to PostgreSQL on
> Mac OS X?
>
> Is a disk image installer fine? Or, is it better to compile all the
> components?
I've always installed from source and I've never been sorry. Haven't
tried it on Leopard yet though. There's no reason to believe that the
various binary installers should be worse than a source install, but
since I've never tried them I really can't tell.
Compiling from source is a good way to get to know both your OS and
Postgres better.
Sincerely,
Niklas Johansson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-12-22 11:03:05 | Re: installation on Mac OS X 10.5.1 |
Previous Message | Richard Broersma Jr | 2007-12-22 06:37:50 | Constraint Trigger's referenced_table |