Re: Bug in pg_restore ... ?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in pg_restore ... ?
Date: 2005-06-10 01:41:05
Message-ID: 42A8EFB1.7090202@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> 'k, is the bug with pg_dump, or pg_restore? I'm guessing pg_dump, but
>> just want to make sure ...
>
> Yeah it is an ordering problem with pg_dump...

The bug is in pg_dump and isn't fixed until 8.0.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-06-10 01:53:22 psql: \x and slash commands
Previous Message Edmund Dengler 2005-06-10 01:30:13 INHERITS and planning