| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in pg_restore ... ? |
| Date: | 2005-06-09 20:57:41 |
| Message-ID: | 42A8AD45.70702@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>
>> Yes that bug definately exists in 7.4 we have had multiple problems
>> with it. I do believe it is fixed in the 8 series though.
>
>
> 'k, is the bug with pg_dump, or pg_restore? I'm guessing pg_dump, but
> just want to make sure ...
Yeah it is an ordering problem with pg_dump...
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-09 21:32:45 | Re: Bug in pg_restore ... ? |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-06-09 20:38:25 | Re: Bug in pg_restore ... ? |