| From: | Jeffrey Tenny <jeffrey(dot)tenny(at)comcast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Need help to decide Mysql vs Postgres |
| Date: | 2005-06-06 15:51:22 |
| Message-ID: | 42A470FA.1080001@comcast.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Re: your JDBC wishes: Consider IBM Cloudscape (now Apache Derby) too,
which has an apache license. It's all pure java and it's easy to get going.
As to MySql vs Postgres: license issues aside, if you have
transactionally complex needs (multi-table updates, etc), PostgreSQL
wins hands down in my experience. There are a bunch of things about
MySQL that just suck for high end SQL needs. (I like my subqueries,
and I absolutely demand transactional integrity).
There are some pitfalls to pgsql though, especially for existing SQL
code using MAX and some other things which can really be blindsided
(performance-wise) by pgsql if you don't use the workarounds.
MySQL is nice for what I call "raw read speed" applications. But that
license is an issue for me, as it is for you apparently.
Some cloudscape info:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/cloudscape/
Some info on pitfalls of MySQL and PostgreSQL, an interesting contrast:
http://sql-info.de/postgresql/postgres-gotchas.html
http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John A Meinel | 2005-06-06 15:52:09 | Re: Performance nightmare with dspam (urgent) (resolved) |
| Previous Message | Michael Stone | 2005-06-06 15:19:11 | Re: Performance nightmare with dspam (urgent) (resolved) |