Re: Performance nightmare with dspam (urgent) (resolved)

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance nightmare with dspam (urgent) (resolved)
Date: 2005-06-06 15:19:11
Message-ID: 20050606151911.GB19670@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:08:23AM -0500, John A Meinel wrote:
>I don't know if you can do it, but it would be nice to see this be 1
>RAID1 for OS, 1 RAID10 for pg_xlog,

That's probably overkill--it's a relatively small sequential-write
partition with really small writes; I don't see how pg_xlog would
benefit from raid10 as opposed to raid1.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeffrey Tenny 2005-06-06 15:51:22 Re: Need help to decide Mysql vs Postgres
Previous Message PFC 2005-06-06 15:11:31 Re: Performance nightmare with dspam (urgent) (resolved)