From: | Bricklen Anderson <BAnderson(at)PresiNET(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tablespace-level Block Size Definitions |
Date: | 2005-05-31 21:01:13 |
Message-ID: | 429CD099.5020804@PresiNET.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm sure this has been thought of but was wondering whether anyone had
> discussed the allowance of run-time block size specifications at the
> tablespace level? I know that a change such as this would substantially
> impact buffer operations, transactions, access methods, the storage
> manager, and a lot of other stuff, however it would give an
> administrator the ability to inhance performance for specific applications.
>
> Arguably, one can set the block size at compile-time, but for a system
> running multiple databases it *may* be a nice feature. Would it be used
> a lot? Probably not. Would I use it? Certainly! Would some of my
> clients use it? Yes.
>
> Perhaps a TODO item for some advantageous company to fund?
>
> -Jonah
Have you used Oracle's version as well?
--
_______________________________
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does
not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or
copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in
error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
_______________________________
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-31 21:01:47 | Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ... |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-05-31 20:55:29 | Tablespace-level Block Size Definitions |