From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ... |
Date: | 2005-05-31 21:01:47 |
Message-ID: | 20050531180026.I933@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Just want to make sure that this is, in fact, what is expected:
>
>> client1: begin;
>> client1: update articles set some_col = <foo> where id = <bar>;
>> client2: update articles set some_col2 = <foo2> where id = <bar>;
>> client1: update articles set some_col3 = <foo> where id = <bar>;
>> client1: ** deadlock **
>
>> client2 can't finish its 'transaction', and is therefore preventing
>> client1 from continuing ... ?
>
> Hmm, I can see why client2 might be blocked by client1, but if client1
> holds the lock it should be able to continue to update the table.
>
> I take it from your title that this only happens if there's a tsearch2
> index on the table? Can you put together a test case?
I haven't tried this myself, but the client wrote this very quick script
that apparently recreates it every time:
test.sql:
---------------------------------------
/* load contrib/btree_gist.sql into database */
begin;
create table test (
id serial primary key,
age int
);
create index test_age_key on test using gist(age);
insert into test values (nextval('test_id_seq'), 1);
commit;
/*
client1:
begin; update test set age = 2 where id = 1;
client2:
update test set age = 2 where id = 1;
client1:
update test set age = 2 where id = 1;
...deadlock...
*/
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-31 21:05:02 | Re: Tablespace-level Block Size Definitions |
Previous Message | Bricklen Anderson | 2005-05-31 21:01:13 | Re: Tablespace-level Block Size Definitions |