| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Dbsize backend integration |
| Date: | 2005-07-04 13:53:42 |
| Message-ID: | 4288.1120485222@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> Aside from the fact that's a change to the API that we had settled on,
> it doesn't solve the actual problem of needing a suitable name for a
> function that returns the size of a table /or/ index. pg_relation_size()
> or pg_table_size() can't be used for precisely the reason they were
> rejected for that purpose in the first place.
Rejected by whom? pg_relation_size is an excellent choice for that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-04 14:02:26 | Re: User's exception plpgsql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-07-04 12:33:27 | Re: Schedule for release 8.1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-04 14:02:26 | Re: User's exception plpgsql |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2005-07-04 12:20:34 | Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles |