Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Date: 2005-05-13 16:58:25
Message-ID: 4284DCB1.5060407@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:

>Andrew, Merlin,
>
>
>
>>My approach was to remove all significant permissions (including on the
>>catalog) from public and regrant them to a pseudopublic group,
>>comprising designated users. The designated users would notice no
>>difference at all, while everyone else would be able to see only what
>>was explicitly granted to them. But there would be lots of testing and
>>thinking to be done before releasing it into the wild :-)
>>
>>
>
><plug>Doesn't it seem like a really complete set of system views (based on
>information_schema or otherwise) would potentially allow securing the
>pg_catalog?</plug>
>
>
>

Not really, no. It would just be one more thing that my hardening script
had to remove permissions from.

I still have an open mind about the sysviews project, but the more
oversold, hyped and promoted with bogus arguments it gets the more
skeptical I become.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-13 17:13:18 Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-13 16:57:53 Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments