Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Date: 2005-05-13 16:57:53
Message-ID: 24884.1116003473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Andrew, Merlin,
>> My approach was to remove all significant permissions (including on the
>> catalog) from public and regrant them to a pseudopublic group,
>> comprising designated users. The designated users would notice no
>> difference at all, while everyone else would be able to see only what
>> was explicitly granted to them. But there would be lots of testing and
>> thinking to be done before releasing it into the wild :-)

> <plug>Doesn't it seem like a really complete set of system views (based on
> information_schema or otherwise) would potentially allow securing the
> pg_catalog?</plug>

It'd just move the issues to a different place ... you still have to
test and think ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-13 16:58:25 Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-13 16:30:41 Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments