Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-03 19:41:51
Message-ID: 4277D3FF.4030100@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

So nobody has complained about the tarball being too big; yet we made
it harder to use just in case someone might complain ?

--dc--
Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> How come we have never seen anyone complain on the lists that the
>> tarball is too big ( or have we )
>
>
> Because ppl are downloading the "split distributions" instead of the
> whole tarball ... *every* PostgreSQL related port in FreeBSD uses the
> split-dists (only downloads the base and opt packages) ...
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
> (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ:
> 7615664
>
>

--
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-03 23:57:16 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-05-03 19:39:41 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message adnandursun 2005-05-03 20:36:08 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-05-03 19:39:41 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement