Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-03 23:59:19
Message-ID: 20050503205724.M53065@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dave Cramer wrote:

> So nobody has complained about the tarball being too big; yet we made it
> harder to use just in case someone might complain ?

Made what harder to use? You don't like the split, download the full tar
ball ... both options are available to you ... myself, I find my time
better spent working on the end application, not download a bunch of docs
and stuff that I don't need to install ... each to their own ... but,
again, the options are avaialble to you ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Russell Smith 2005-05-04 07:48:47 Re: [OT] Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-03 23:57:16 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2005-05-04 00:14:08 Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-05-03 23:57:16 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement