Re: Constant WAL replay

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at
Subject: Re: Constant WAL replay
Date: 2005-04-25 20:08:57
Message-ID: 426D4E59.1010302@commandprompt.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

>>
>>>What really interests me here: Where is you code located in order to
>>>make sure that this things can work reliably?
>>
>>We are integrated into the PostgreSQL backend.
>
>
> So they have to get a new PostgreSQL release from you for every minor
> upgrade, I assume at no cost?

Yep :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc.

>

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-04-25 20:43:10 Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Previous Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2005-04-25 20:06:33 Re: Constant WAL replay

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-25 21:28:26 Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Previous Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2005-04-25 20:06:33 Re: Constant WAL replay