| From: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at |
| Subject: | Re: Constant WAL replay |
| Date: | 2005-04-25 20:06:33 |
| Message-ID: | 426D4DC9.3080201@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Joshua,
>>
>> This sounds interesting. If you don't use the WAL but a transaction
>> log shipping - what does it mean in terms of PostgreSQL? Do you
>> create your own transaction log?
>
>
> Yes.
>
>> What really interests me here: Where is you code located in order to
>> make sure that this things can work reliably?
>
>
> We are integrated into the PostgreSQL backend.
.... which is a large place ;).
best regards,
hans
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-25 20:08:57 | Re: Constant WAL replay |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-25 20:04:29 | Re: Constant WAL replay |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-04-25 20:08:57 | Re: Constant WAL replay |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-25 20:04:29 | Re: Constant WAL replay |