Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more.
Date: 2021-06-15 16:51:28
Message-ID: 426708.1623775888@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Oh, maybe I'm the one who misunderstood...

So, it's well over a year later, and so far as I can see exactly
nothing has been done about snapshot_too_old's problems.

I never liked that feature to begin with, and I would be very
glad to undertake the task of ripping it out. If someone thinks
this should not happen, please commit to fixing it ... and not
"eventually".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-15 17:00:28 Re: a path towards replacing GEQO with something better
Previous Message Alexander Pyhalov 2021-06-15 16:29:17 Re: Case expression pushdown