| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more. |
| Date: | 2021-06-15 17:10:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20210615171036.4jtj22hppvsd36e6@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2021-06-15 12:51:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Oh, maybe I'm the one who misunderstood...
>
> So, it's well over a year later, and so far as I can see exactly
> nothing has been done about snapshot_too_old's problems.
>
> I never liked that feature to begin with, and I would be very
> glad to undertake the task of ripping it out. If someone thinks
> this should not happen, please commit to fixing it ... and not
> "eventually".
I still think that's the most reasonable course. I actually like the
feature, but I don't think a better implementation of it would share
much if any of the current infrastructure.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-06-15 17:10:42 | Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-06-15 17:09:38 | disfavoring unparameterized nested loops |