Re: Great

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Great
Date: 2005-04-14 02:18:11
Message-ID: 425DD2E3.90400@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/linuxunix/0,39020390,39194883,00.htm
>
>
> I also wonder why we never contacted IBM...

Because it isn't relevant. Regardless of IBMs decision to be good to
OSS. It is better, when it is known to be patent using free.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit
http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org

In response to

  • Re: Great at 2005-04-14 01:19:13 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Responses

  • Re: Great at 2005-04-14 02:52:45 from Marc G. Fournier

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-04-14 02:18:35 Re: Great
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-04-14 01:19:13 Re: Great