| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Great |
| Date: | 2005-04-14 02:52:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20050413235211.T5287@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>> http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/linuxunix/0,39020390,39194883,00.htm
>>
>>
>> I also wonder why we never contacted IBM...
>
> Because it isn't relevant. Regardless of IBMs decision to be good to OSS. It
> is better, when it is known to be patent using free.
And, notice IBMs comment in the article that states that even IBM isn't
sure what they would do in the circumstances we've detailed :(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-04-14 15:40:51 | Re: Great |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-04-14 02:18:35 | Re: Great |