From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: DELETE ... USING |
Date: | 2005-04-07 01:57:13 |
Message-ID: | 42549379.3050803@samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway wrote:
> Sure, a revised patch is attached. Note that this change will also
> require updating 25 (!) of the regression tests, since they use the
> SELECT-without-FROM syntax.
I've applied the attached patch to HEAD. Due to the widespread updates
to the regression tests, the tests for some platforms may be (trivially)
broken, despite my efforts to make the necessary updates. If that's the
case, please let me know.
-Neil
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
delete_using-9.patch.gz | application/gzip | 16.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-04-07 01:59:06 | Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-04-06 23:24:46 | Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-04-07 07:04:26 | add_missing_from = false |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-04-06 23:56:25 | Re: avg(int2) and avg(int8) micro-opt |