Re: DELETE ... USING

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DELETE ... USING
Date: 2005-04-06 10:51:05
Message-ID: 4253BF19.3020904@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Could you provide a patch?

Sure, a revised patch is attached. Note that this change will also
require updating 25 (!) of the regression tests, since they use the
SELECT-without-FROM syntax. I will update the tests (by adding an
explicit FROM clause) before applying the patch -- which I'll do
tomorrow, barring any objections.

-Neil

Attachment Content-Type Size
delete_using-7.patch text/x-patch 20.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Palle Girgensohn 2005-04-06 13:01:56 prepared statements don't log arguments?
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2005-04-06 10:45:34 Re: DELETE ... USING

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-04-06 23:56:25 Re: avg(int2) and avg(int8) micro-opt
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2005-04-06 10:45:34 Re: DELETE ... USING