From: | "Bruno Almeida do Lago" <teolupus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout |
Date: | 2005-02-24 13:28:34 |
Message-ID: | 421dd635.7b3d0b0f.1e05.1618@smtp.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
No problems my friend :P
I thought that since the beginning and just sent the e-mail to confirm if
there was no software limitation.
Best Wishes,
Bruno Almeida do Lago
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 6:02 PM
To: Bruno Almeida do Lago
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout
Bruno,
> For example, 150 active connections on a medium-end
> 32-bit Linux server will consume significant system resources, and 600 is
> about the limit."
That, is, "is about the limit for a medium-end 32-bit Linux server".
Sorry
if the implication didn't translate well. If you use beefier hardware, of
course, you can manage more connections; personally I've never needed more
than 1000, even on a web site that gets 100,000 d.u.v.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Allgood | 2005-02-24 18:31:38 | Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout |
Previous Message | Markus Schaber | 2005-02-24 12:13:09 | Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? |