From: | Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? |
Date: | 2005-02-24 12:13:09 |
Message-ID: | 421DC4D5.1070909@logi-track.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Gaetano,
Gaetano Mendola schrieb:
> I have the same requirement too. Actually pg_autovacuum can not be
> instructed "per table" so some time the global settings are not good
> enough. I have a table of logs with 6 milions rows ( 3 years logs )
> I insert on that page ~ 6000 rows for day. I'm running pg_autovacuum
> with setting to ANALYZE or VACUUM table if the 10% is touched.
> With this setting pg_autovacuum will analyze that table each 3 months!!!
If you have only inserts, and only so few on a large table, you do not
need to vacuum such often. Not to reclaim space, only to prevent
transaction ID wraparound (which is ensured by pg_autovacuum).
And if the data distribution does not change, frequently calling ANALYZE
does not help much, either.
Markus
--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com | www.logi-track.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Almeida do Lago | 2005-02-24 13:28:34 | Re: Peformance Tuning Opterons/ Hard Disk Layout |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2005-02-24 10:58:51 | Re: is pg_autovacuum so effective ? |