| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: make update-po problem with USE_PGXS |
| Date: | 2021-11-14 09:49:46 |
| Message-ID: | 421090ae-62d8-2056-9b8c-44a65798a4c4@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01.11.21 04:56, wangsh(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> I'm developing an extension, after modifying some source file(add some message
> like gettext('xxxxx')) and execute
>> $ make USE_PGXS=1 update-po
>> make: Nothing to be done for 'update-po'.
> I feel strange because I think *.po.new files should be created.
I don't think the NLS makefiles were ever adjusted to work with PGXS.
It's not surprising to me that some amount of adjustment appears to be
necessary to make the paths right.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2021-11-14 09:59:51 | Re: Commitfest 2021-11 Patch Triage - Part 2 |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-11-14 06:14:38 | Re: Replication & recovery_min_apply_delay |