From: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sim Zacks <sim(at)nospam(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: change table to view problem |
Date: | 2005-02-03 09:25:54 |
Message-ID: | 4201EE22.7010108@archonet.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sim Zacks wrote:
> I merged 2 tables into 1 table and created a view for each of the tables so
> as not to break existing applications. I renamed the old tables with the
> _old suffix in case there was a problem so I could verify against the old
> data.
>
> The problem is that all the views and functions switched the name of the
> table to the renamed table and do not use the new views I have created. Is
> there a recommended way of updating all the views and functions that use
> the table to start using the view?
This is how it's supposed to work. System objects (views, foreign-keys,
some functions etc) track other objects by their OID. Otherwise changes
to table-names, or schema search-paths could wreak havoc.
If you want to attach the views to the new tables then you'll need to
recreate them.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julian Scarfe | 2005-02-03 09:44:41 | Re: pgpool 2.5b2 released |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-02-03 09:22:55 | Re: Problem with the sequence |