Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date: 2024-05-03 19:02:12
Message-ID: 41a318b4-21b2-4b60-89bb-72fa3edbc2ce@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03.05.24 10:39, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I would
>> recommend to update the documentation of PQinitSSL and PQinitOpenSSL
>> to tell that these become useless and are deprecated.
> They are no-ops when linking against v18, but writing an extension which
> targets all supported versions of postgres along with their respective
> supported OpenSSL versions make them still required, or am I missing something?

I don't think extensions come into play here, since this is libpq, so
only the shared library interface compatibility matters.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-05-03 19:21:33 Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-05-03 18:58:30 Re: Support LIKE with nondeterministic collations