From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: More Code Page wierdness |
Date: | 2005-01-11 17:08:43 |
Message-ID: | 41E4081B.1070404@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Simon Riggs wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>>
>>
>>>I'm having trouble seeing why '*' would have a different value in
>>>different codepages. I'm wondering if we're going down the wrong road
>>>completely here?
>>>
>>>
>>That was what was bothering me too. It's hard to interpret Simon's
>>report in another way though.
>>
>>
>
>I'm open to other suggestions as to why "*" would not work, when other
>explicit settings do....
>
>...especially something that gets fixed by changing the code page.
>
>I do agree that its hard to see whats going on... I spent 4 hrs on a *
>
>
Can you hex dump a file edited with various code pages in place and see
what different values an asterisk gets? That should settle the question,
shouldn't it?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-01-11 18:11:11 | Re: More Code Page wierdness |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-01-11 17:02:23 | Re: Bugs |