On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> > I'm having trouble seeing why '*' would have a different value in
> > different codepages. I'm wondering if we're going down the wrong road
> > completely here?
>
> That was what was bothering me too. It's hard to interpret Simon's
> report in another way though.
I'm open to other suggestions as to why "*" would not work, when other
explicit settings do....
...especially something that gets fixed by changing the code page.
I do agree that its hard to see whats going on... I spent 4 hrs on a *
--
Best Regards, Simon Riggs