Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft

From: Gary Doades <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk>
To:
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date: 2005-01-11 07:37:21
Message-ID: 41E38231.5090301@gpdnet.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Dave Cramer wrote:
> Ok, so one use case is to select a large number of rows and do some
> non-trivial operation on them.
> I can see where getting the rows inside the server process ( ie some
> procedural language ) thereby reducing the round trip overhead would be
> beneficial. However how do you deal with the lack of control ? For
> instance what happens if you run out of memory while doing this ? I'm
> not sure about other DB'S but if you crash the procedural language
> inside postgres you will bring the server down.
>
> It would seem to me that any non-trivial operation would be better
> handled outside the server process, even if it costs you the round trip.

Since a .NET language is operating effectively inside a VM it is pretty
much impossible to bring down the server that way. Only a bug in the
.NET runtime itself will do that. The C# try/catch/finally with .NET
global execption last chance handlers will ensure the server and your
code is well protected.

Cheers,
Gary.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pete de Zwart 2005-01-11 09:23:25 Best filesystem for PostgreSQL Database Cluster under Linux
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-01-11 06:35:18 Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?