Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
Date: 2005-01-11 06:35:18
Message-ID: 200501102235.18887.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Chris,

> I don't know so much about FreeBSD's handling of this, but on Linux,
> there's pretty strong indication that _SOFTWARE_ RAID is faster than
> hardware RAID.

Certainly better than an Adaptec. But not necessarily better than a
medium-end RAID card, like an LSI. It really depends on the quality of the
controller.

Also, expected concurrent activity should influence you. On a dedicated
database server, you'll seldom max out the CPU but will often max of the
disk, so the CPU required by software RAID is "free". However, if you have
a Web/PG/E-mail box which frequently hits 100% CPU, then even a lower-end
RAID card can be beneficial simply by taking load off the CPU.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gary Doades 2005-01-11 07:37:21 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-01-11 04:31:22 Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?