From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Miles Keaton <mileskeaton(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? |
Date: | 2005-01-11 03:44:34 |
Message-ID: | 41E34BA2.2040502@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Miles Keaton wrote:
>I'm sorry if there's a URL out there answering this, but I couldn't find it.
>
>For those of us that need the best performance possible out of a
>dedicated dual-CPU PostgreSQL server, what is recommended?
>
>AMD64/Opteron or i386/Xeon?
>
>
AMD64/Opteron
>Linux or FreeBSD or _?_
>
>
This is a religious question :)
>I'm assuming hardware RAID 10 on 15k SCSI drives is fastest disk performance.
>
>
And many, many disks -- yes.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>Any hardware-comparison benchmarks out there showing the results for
>different PostgreSQL setups?
>
>Thanks!
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 285 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2005-01-11 04:04:20 | Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Miles Keaton | 2005-01-11 02:42:13 | which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL? |