| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6 |
| Date: | 2004-12-03 21:49:46 |
| Message-ID: | 41B0DF7A.8090508@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>> I think that this case might be fixed
>> by the tweaking I did yesterday, but I can't tell whether that run
>> occurred before or after that commit. In any case it's not a real
>> failure, just an output-ordering difference.
>>
>>
>
> I am running it again to see. I agree that at worst it would require
> an alternative output file, assuming we aren't bothered by these
> ordering differences.
>
>
No, it's still there :-(
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-03 22:02:05 | Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) |
| Previous Message | schmidtm | 2004-12-03 21:49:33 | somebody working on: Prevent default re-use of sysids for dropped users and groups? |