Re: merging advocacy and "overview"

From: Omar Kilani <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Date: 2004-12-02 18:03:24
Message-ID: 41AF58EC.8070100@tinysofa.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Josh Berkus said the following on 2/12/2004 12:39 PM:
> Robert,
>
>>the only reason to go with advocacy is due to it's replacing
>>advocacy.postgresql.org; ie. it's a community standard vs. industry
>>standard.
>
>
> Sure. However, I'm more concerned about the public & press being able to find
> things than long-term community members, who can always ask on IRC. "About"
> is instantly understandable to web users; "Advocacy" is not.
>
> So, an example of "About", a la Omar:
> http://postgresql.tinysofa.com/about/casestudies
>
> I think this works.

Additionally, we've already restructured and pretty much finished the
whole site. And see no reason why it can't be in for the 15th of December.

Omar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Marshall 2004-12-02 18:11:28 Re: DeltaSoft on press release
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-12-02 17:51:11 Re: DeltaSoft on press release

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2004-12-02 18:52:09 Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-12-02 17:53:23 Re: Links for press page ... where will these things be?