| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
| Date: | 2004-12-02 17:39:37 |
| Message-ID: | 200412020939.37177.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Robert,
> the only reason to go with advocacy is due to it's replacing
> advocacy.postgresql.org; ie. it's a community standard vs. industry
> standard.
Sure. However, I'm more concerned about the public & press being able to find
things than long-term community members, who can always ask on IRC. "About"
is instantly understandable to web users; "Advocacy" is not.
So, an example of "About", a la Omar:
http://postgresql.tinysofa.com/about/casestudies
I think this works.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-12-02 17:45:12 | DeltaSoft on press release |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-12-02 17:37:28 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-02 17:53:23 | Re: Links for press page ... where will these things be? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-12-02 17:37:28 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |