Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PL/Perl <plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl
Date: 2004-11-19 04:15:07
Message-ID: 419D734B.6090804@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>Agreed. Someone's going to step up and patch this, no?
>
>(Not me --- I've already wasted more hours than I could afford this week
>on plperl.)
>
>
We can do it, but it will have to be after thanksgiving.

J

> regards, tom lane
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 285 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dru 2004-11-19 04:15:54 Re: Can postgresql accept mutliple connections in the same
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-19 04:11:14 Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl